May as well have a go with my current car -
2008 9-5 TiD Linear SE AutoThis is my 4th 9-5, and the 8th Saab I've had.
The main reason I bought this car was because of the economy. I needed an Auto as my knee was playing up a bit, and with 35,000 miles to cover a year, a diesel was the sensible option.
At the time I bought the car, I was looking at other marques. There was no way I could get a similary aged BMW 5 series or Audi A6 for the same money. Best I saw at the time was a 5 series which was 2 years older, and with double the miles. And that was still £4000 more.
I was initially wary of going for such a big car with a 1.9 diesel, but after test driving a couple of cars, found that they had a decent amount of power. Certainly enough to keep up with the flow without effort.
My previous car was a 9-5 Aero estate. It's hard to draw comparisons with Aero's in general, as there was something wrong with mine and it was no where near as quick as it should have been. The TiD felt just as quick from rest - it was only in mid range where the TiD is lacking compared to that Aero. I've often thought of having the TiD remapped as it could do with a little more shove in the mid range, though I've wimped out so far.
Economy is very good. The official combined figure for the car is 37.2mpg. My journey to work is 72 miles, with mostly Motorway and Dual Carriageways in quiet traffic. In 8 months of doing this journey, I have yet to get as low as 37mpg. I average more like 45 mpg for the commute, though have had over 50mpg on several occasions - 53.1mpg being my personal best.
I don't keep an eye on the economy in town, as I do so few miles in town traffic, so it's not that relevant for me. I think in town it's probably around 30mpg.
The VED is high for this car as it's an auto and just slips into band K - think it's £225 for the year to pay for these superb roads and world class public transport system
Styling - it does grow on you. I didn't like it when it came out - especially the rear, but quite like it now.
Things I don't like about the car:- Steering wheel - looks better than the older 9-5 one, but I hadn't realised I held the wheel at the bottom on the M-Way so much - can't do that on the new one.
- Computer SID - on the old car you could go backwards and forwards through the different options, on the Dame Edna car you have to click all the way through to get round to the one you want. Annoying if you press it once too may times, then you have to click it 6 or 7 times to go through everything and get back to where you wanted to be.
- Dash - looks a bit bland IMHO.
- Linear SE - wished I'd gone for a Vector Sport with leather and bigger wheels. Ah well.
- Could do with more cup holders in the front. (Did I really just type that! )
- Rain sensing wipers - not very good at sensing rain. Fine once you tell it's raining by turning them on yourself. Works fine after that. My old Skoda Superb was exactly the same - don't think it's a Saab thing.
- Depreciation
Good points:- Economy as above.
- Space and practicality - though this would go for all 9-5 estates.
- Performance is very respectable - could just do with a wee bit more in mid range.
- Radio/CD is more industry standard - so a lot easier to upgrade to a new double din unit (unlike the old car)
- Seats - still very comfy and supportive.
- ESP - not standard on all 9-5's, but this has saved me on several occasions when it's kicked in before I even realised the car was losing grip.
- Real world crash safety
- It's a Saab!
I'll add more to this when I think of it. Generally happy with the car - it's no where near as bad as the motoring press would have you believe. Because of the depreciation, I really think you'd struggle to get a better comparable car for the money.