Hi
There's a long-running issue with my 2003 Aero. It takes 4, 5, 6 - sometimes more attempts before it fires into life. It's turning over fine but just not catching. It's fine when it's running & if i turn it off then on again when the engine is warm - no problems.
So far I have replaced the CPS & DI Cassette with brand new ones & the battery is good too (according to the AA & Main Dealer). The car has been into the Main Dealer here to see if they could find anything. They had it 4 days but found no faults & no codes stored either. It then went into the dealer for a service - replacing spark plugs, fuel filter, & all the other sundries but still the problem persists.
However - after a good bit of messing around, I have found a split hose on the engine block. Hopefully the picture will be attached here so you guys know what I'm talking about. Is it possible that this split is drawing air in & bypassing the air-flow meter & causing my starting problem? The car is also using much more fuel than normal. The split itself is underneath the pipe I've marked between the 2 arrows (which runs round to the 3rd arrow) & most likely caused by the pipe rubbing against the other.
Does anyone know if it's possible to replace just the worn hose, or do I need a whole new breather kit?
Any help would be much appreciated to get this 9-5 back in top shape!!
Thanks
B
Welcome! :)
I don't think that there's a breather kit for your car. The breather kits you read about are for the 9-5 from 1998-2003. The 2004-on cars have a completely redesigned breather system and engine casting. And judging by the unpainted cam cover on your engine, your car is a later one.
But you do need to replace the hose. It is the pipe between the engine and the inlet system to the back of the turbo and it will indeed bypass the air metering and make the car air/fuel mixture run weak.
I'm not with my parts list at the moment, but I should be able to find a part number. Although I don't think that there's anything very special about the pipe, it needs to be oil resistant and temperature resistant, though. But otherwise a length of pipe from a roll may do. In similar circumstances I have cut the pipe at the split and put a piece of copper tube in there with a jubilee clip at each end.
I'm surprised that with all that oil spray around, that a garage didn't find the split straight away. I'm off in the morning to check that pipe on my car!!
Thanks SGould :) I've been lurking on here for a while, having come over from the old forum but haven't had the chance to post until now!
You were quick on saabscene but even quicker here it seems! 10 mins after I'd posted - I've got an answer. :)
It does seem a little weird. The main dealer has been saying there's an oil leak but it's nothing to worry about. On 28th December when in for the service - they suggested a pressure clean & monitoring! My guess is that they've plugged it in - not found any codes & not rooted around in the engine bay a great deal in order to find the split. I only found it by lifting up the top hose & looking under it. Perhaps there used to be a clip to seperate them? I'm going to fix one up once this is fixed though.
As you suggest - I'll replace the hose with the same again & see if that clears the starting problem. It's odd that it starts without a problem when the engine is warm though. I haven't been out in daylight to find the other end of the hose - although it can't be too far away I'm sure! If you get a part number then let me know & I'll order the proper piece of kit. If not - no worries & I'll fix one up from some hose.
It's times like this when I miss having Elkparts around :(
Thanks for your help as always!
B
Well I haven't looked at that pipe on my car directly but I have got some photos of it taken last year. It's a 2007 model 9-5. The pipe seems to be made of a completely different material. Is your car an earlier 2004/5 car? If so, it's possible that the pipe material was changed for a reason....
Here's what mine looks like.
(http://gallery.me.com/hahnenuk/102533/DSC00677/web.jpg)
(http://gallery.me.com/hahnenuk/102533/DSC00324/web.jpg)
Yours definately looks more resilient! Mine is a soft rubber - kinda squishy if that makes sense. Yours seems to be more plasticy! They must have changed it on later models right enough. Mine is a 2003 - though I think it was a December 2003 so may be a 2004 model. I really should know this! It's got the heated rear seat etc - I think it's one of the last "good" Aeros before they stripped them back again in 2004.
If you look at my second picture,you can see the VIN Number (also in the windscreen and on the door sill). Model year will be the 10th digit. Mine is 7 for 2007. So yours should be either 3 or 4.
Quote from: Bruce on 17 January 2012, 12:44:41 AM
Mine is a 2003 - though I think it was a December 2003 so may be a 2004 model. I really should know this!
What shape are your front fog lights?...
foglights are the old oval type ones. It's pre-facelift that they did in 2004. I'll check the vin when I get home though.
Here'a the 2004 Crankcase Ventilation System.
Pipe 7 (see attachment), the one that has split was changed during 2004. So, surely there must have been a problem with the hose you have?
Article : Hose
PartNo : 5961552
Engine --4017590
Order Quantity : 1
Article : Hose
PartNo : 5961610
Engine 4017591--
Order Quantity : 1
And just for completeness, here's the 1998-2003 system
Been having a think about this....
Your engine picture shows you have a 2004 engine. So either you have a 2004 model or a replacement engine. As it was a December 2003 car I reckon it's the original engine and you have a 2004 model.
However, if you have a 2004 car with a front end that looks like this:
(http://gallery.me.com/hahnenuk/100011/DSC02173_2/web.jpg)
Do you have an Aero? The only 2004 car with the old "Aero" front was the Vector Sport which carried on the 2002-2003 front bumper with the lip under the bumper.
You've got me interested now........ :)
The 2004-5 Aero has a front with round foglights that looks like this attachment:
Hi Folks
I took my picture into the dealer today & ordered the new part. It's on your 1998-2003 diagram SGould and is the hose you described. I also have some more info on my car no I'm home. December is in my head as my other car was registered in December (a Volvo - please don't hate me!). My 9-5 was first registered on 25 March 2003 & the 10th number on the vin is 3. It's an Aero, has heated rear seat, upgraded stereo but no sat-nav. I have attached a pic for clarity!
Hopefully, my replacing the hose will sort out my starting issue! :)
Incidentally - the dealer confirmed that earlier models have a rubber pipe running round the side of the engine & connecting to a metal pipe further back - where newer versions are all metal. I guess there must have been a few problems like mine!
So, you have a March 2003 car with an unpainted cam cover..... Hmmm! I wonder how that happened?
I'm still not onvinced that you have a 2003 engine as the pipework on the earlier car on my (updated PCV) 2002 looked like this (I can't find any pictures from before I upgraded the PCV):
(http://gallery.me.com/hahnenuk/100629/DSC02526/web.jpg)
That picture shows that my 2002 car had a metal pipe. It was changed.
Article : Tube
PartNo : 9183849
Usage : NLS-USE 30567027
Order Quantity : 1
But I can't find the 30567027 listed for any later application.....
Quote from: sgould on 17 January 2012, 03:59:23 PM
Your engine picture shows you have a 2004 engine. So either you have a 2004 model or a replacement engine. As it was a December 2003 car I reckon it's the original engine and you have a 2004 model.
The picture of the engine quite clearly shows it's the earlier PCV setup as the later breather setup had cam covers that had the clips to hold the pipes in place that you can see in the other pictures, It's an early engine with an unpainted cam cover, quite normal on a 2003 car.
That's interesting! I must look more closely in future... ::)
I'll have a look for the engine number & see if we can decipher from that...
Are you thinking my engine is from a 2004? or 2002? It's possible that either have been installed if they were waiting around in the factory looking for homes! It does seem a little strange though. I'll dig about for some more info on the engine & see what I come up with!
Quote from: Bruce on 17 January 2012, 07:24:08 PM
I'll have a look for the engine number & see if we can decipher from that...
Are you thinking my engine is from a 2004? or 2002? It's possible that either have been installed if they were waiting around in the factory looking for homes! It does seem a little strange though. I'll dig about for some more info on the engine & see what I come up with!
You've a 2003 engine in there. or so i say.
2003 SAAB PETROL 4 DOOR SALOON (9-5 AERO AUTO)
Quote from: Bruce on 17 January 2012, 07:24:08 PM
I'll have a look for the engine number & see if we can decipher from that...
Are you thinking my engine is from a 2004? or 2002? It's possible that either have been installed if they were waiting around in the factory looking for homes! It does seem a little strange though. I'll dig about for some more info on the engine & see what I come up with!
It's a 2003 engine, they changed the cam covers from painted black to a bare metal alloy at some point in 2003, the 2004 engines onwards have a different type of connector on them for the breather hose.
I picked up the part from the dealer today. £6.56 it cost, so not bad. I'm going to swap it over on Friday I think, when I can get some daylight to do it. Does anyone know what is in the hose? Can I expect a few drops of oil to drip out - or is something going to come gushing out all over the driveway?!
It should all be above the oil level. It should be just a bit oily. It's the route that the oil fumes from the crankcase get sucked into the inlet.
Quick update so far...
The dealer gave me the wrong hose (despite me taking pictures to them) so I bought a piece of copper pipe & jubilee clips as suggested by sgould and gave it a go. It turned out I could just cut the hose & attach it straight onto the metal pipe as the split was so close to it. I took it for a drive and it's certainly cleared up the fumes in the cabin problem!
It's still taking a while to start from cold though - maybe 5 or 6 attempts. The rev counter doesn't move whilst it's turning over. Should I be thinking about the CPS again? I replaced this a year ago - along with the DI cartridge (the fuel pump was changed 2.5 years ago) but I stupidly didn't reattach the heat-shield to the CPS as I'd broken it during removal.
I guess what I'm asking is do you think that without the heat-shield, there wold be sufficient heat from the engine to damage the CPS? I've got a spare (new) CPS and I've ordered a s/h heat-shield from Neo-bros which I can have a go with - however as it was a very fiddly job last time, I want to be pretty sure this time around!
Thanks!
I think heat damage is possible. It is very hot down there. And the CPS does seem to get iffy when it gets hot.
Ref CPS, having doen one just last weekend my recommendation is to drop the exhaust for easier access. You'll need to remove the lower stud from the turbo housing- might be worth having a spare to hand. Even if you don't take the stud out, the extra couple of mm gained by pulling the exhaust away from the turbo is well worthwhile.
I wouldn't remove anything to get at the CPS, especially not mucking about with the exhaust! I've done a few with the car sitting on the floor with a short ratchet (the one out of the Halfords professional 190 piece kit) in less than 30 minutes for the entire job, If I had to do it again now I'd suggest using a set of Halfords flexi-head ratchet spanners and use the Torx adaptor in that, should make the job really easy. Also I'd be measuring the resistance of the CPS before contemplating changing it.